18 July 2022

AMA may call for AHPRA Royal Commission

AHPRA AMA Political

Frustration with the regulator and its lack of transparency has reached a fever pitch, with the treatment of Dr David Berger a last straw for many.


As AHPRA’s powers continue to grow, a subcommittee of the AMA Victoria council wants to see a formal public inquiry into the regulator.  

Members will decide whether to progress AMA Victoria’s motion to request a formal public inquiry into the regulator at the national conference next week in Sydney.  

The proposed motion comes from the AMA Victoria compliance advisory group and was approved by the state AMA council and board to be taken to the national conference.  

AMA Victoria council member Dr Mukesh Haikerwal, a GP in Melbourne, said that previous Senate-level inquiries into AHPRA had not gone far enough.  

“A Royal Commission goes beyond just the people in the senate, and it would be able to look at the documentation of cases that have been problematic,” he told The Medical Republic

“It could look in a much more detailed level at doctor-on-doctor violence, where complaints are being used as a tool for fiscal or professional gain over a rival.” 

Dr Haikerwal said that the idea to put the motion forward had been brewing for months and was unrelated to any specific cases.  

“Nobody [in government] is understanding the physical, mental and sometimes finite outcome on the health professional caught in the complaints process,” he said.  

“It’s not a fair process. People don’t trust it, and it’s leading to people leaving the profession and people leaving their lives.” 

The motion comes after several months of increasing tensions between the regulator and industry. 

Earlier this month, a Queensland parliament committee green-lit amendments to national AHPRA law which will allow the regulator to publicly name practitioners under investigation before the investigation is complete. 

The AMA, RACGP, ACRRM and other medical organisations opposed this change, citing the likelihood of undue reputational damage.  

In June, AHPRA and the Medical Board of Australia ordered WA GP Dr David Berger to complete additional training on “behaving professionally and courteously to colleagues and other practitioners” on social media.  

TMR understands that the conditions placed on Dr Berger’s registration were related to Twitter posts in which he criticised government easing of pandemic restrictions.  

Dr Berger declined to speak to TMR and other media on this matter, but colleagues – including former AMA WA president Dr Andrew Miller and MJA editor-in-chief Professor Nick Talley – have publicly spoken out against AHPRA’s decision.  

Other prominent clinicians like Professor Raina MacIntyre, Distinguished Professor Lidia Morawska and occupational hygienist Kate Cole have since added to the chorus, co-signing an open letter to federal, state and territory health ministers in support of Dr Berger. 

The letter criticised the wording of AHPRA’s social media policy and argued that it is “so broad as to potentially permit discretionary outcomes.  

“It could be interpreted one way to target some doctors who do not have support of government, and another to allow other doctors who are government spokespersons to behave as they wish on social media, simply because their views accord with the administration,” the letter said.  

The letter requested that the conditions placed on Dr Berger be retracted and called for an independent audit of the way AHPRA handles social media and public advocacy complaints. 

“If the open discussion of public health settings by registered practitioners is stifled by authoritarian implementation of regulation, leaving the rest of the community to discuss these issues without alternative ideas from those who have the best understanding of disease, that will not benefit anyone,” the letter said.  

“Australia must not be a country where reputable scientists and clinicians cannot speak for the public good because they fear reprisal from their government regulator.” 

At the time of writing, more than 1500 doctors, healthcare workers and other members of the public had co-signed the letter.  

If this article caused distress or if you are prompted to reach out for support, these services are available:  

Doctors4doctors crisis support hotline: 1300 374 377  

Lifeline: 13 11 14  

Beyond Blue: 1300 22 46 36 

Something to say?

Leave a Reply

5 Comments on "AMA may call for AHPRA Royal Commission"

Please log in in to leave a comment


Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Hao
Guest
Hao
18 days 7 hours ago

It s about time AHPRA is accountable to someone and for some of its dubious actions

John Doe
Guest
John Doe
23 days 21 hours ago
AHPRA in theory, is meant to be a non-judgmental group acting in the best interest of the public. Unfortunately in AHPRA’s mind, the doctor does not equate to being part of the public. There is a high probability of bias on their part in which their motto is more: – the complaint is correct until proven otherwise – the doctor is guilty until proven innocence This is where the problem begins right from the outset, because this isn’t part of our legal system where it should be “a person is innocent until proven guilty”. Then there are the issues of… Read more »
Paul
Guest
Paul
26 days 18 hours ago
AHPRA acts under “National” legislation. If we look more closely the Nation this legislation supports is not The commonwealth it is the states with the “host” legislator of Queensland which is not a nation at all. If the states have created a health care nation as a rival to the Commonwealth, members of this Australian Health Care Nation have no vote. They pay renumeration with no representation and the non elected government of The Australian Health Care Nation, AHPRA and the Boards, are accountable to no one. On the face of it this is non democratic sedition of major proportions.… Read more »
Gino Pecoraro
Member
Gino Pecoraro
29 days 6 hours ago
Every Australian deserves the presumption of innocence and doctors are no different. Using QLD’s unicameral parliamaent as a back door way to bring in such legislation is disgraceful and will be fought with all of our strength. All doctors, irrespective of which state they are in need to join this fight and ask for a proper review of of AHPRA’s functioning. In addition, patients need to understand that for their doctors to best look after them, they too need to feel safe at work and if allowed to go ahead this will certainly lead to increased stress on all doctors.… Read more »
Okporoko
Guest
Okporoko
29 days 7 hours ago
100% correct. The whole system is hopelessly inefficient and when you read about some of the cases and their outcomes you wonder: Does a doctor have no right? So a patient can insult a Gp for minutes and he just has to stay there and take it for fear any reciprocal word (as is humanly normal unless u are Dalai Lama) will inspire a biased clamp down from AHPRA? If you are ACCUSED of being inappropriate then you ARE inappropriate; no reasonable doubt applied. Plus punishments are not in line with the alleged offence: what use is suspending a doctor… Read more »
wpDiscuz