A new systematic review finds 25 studies showing never-smokers are three times more likely to take up the coffin nails after vaping.
A new systematic review has delivered another blow to tobacco companies by finding âstrong evidence that young never-smokers and non-smokers who use e-cigarettes are about three times as likely as non-users to start smoking tobacco and to become regular smokersâ.
In a week when the National Party announced it wants to ease regulation of nicotine-containing vaping products Ââ having accepted at least $275,000 in tobacco industry donations between 2015-16 and 2021-22 â ANU researchers delivered an unequivocal message.
Writing in the Medical Journal of Australia, Professor Emily Banks and colleagues said: âThere is substantial evidence that nicotine e-cigarettes can cause dependence or addiction in non-smokers, and strong evidence that young non-smokers who use e-cigarettes are more likely than non-users to initiate smoking and to become regular smokers. There is limited evidence that freebase nicotine e-cigarettes used with clinical support are efficacious aids for smoking cessation.â
Health Minister Mark Butler was quick to shut down the Nationals, saying the party âhave a blatant conflict of interest in this debate, they are still the only major party that excepts donations from tobacco companiesâ.
âThe tobacco industry has found a new way to develop a generation of nicotine addicts and we will not stand for it,â Butler said.
Professor Banks and her colleagues have provided even more evidence to back the Minister up.
She told TMR that it was âimportant to get things in perspectiveâ.
âEight-nine percent of the population of Australia are not current daily smokers,â she said.
âAbout two-thirds to three-quarters of people who quit smoking successfully do so unaided. Then for those people who need support to quit, there are a range of products which are licensed by the TGA and found to be safe and effective.
âThe people who are left, who have tried everything else, they could potentially benefit from vaping.â
Professor Banks said tobacco companies and vaping advocates were using the possible benefits to a small proportion of smokers to justify âsomething which is affecting the whole population, including the 89% who don’t smoke dailyâ.
âThe vast majority of young people don’t smoke,â she said. âOur youth are leading the way with smoking cessation.
âE-cigarettes have been used like a cross between a Trojan horse and Pandora’s box. Theyâve been brought to the community, saying this is really helpful for smokers to quit. And when you open it up, there’s bubblegum-flavoured vapes that are being promoted to 13-year-olds to use in the school toilets.
âThat’s not what the community signed up for.â
Banks et al. found âstrong evidenceâ from 25 studies showing that âyoung never-smokers and non-smokers who use e-cigarettes are about three times as likely as non-users to start smoking tobacco and to become regular smokersâ.
âThe relationship between e-cigarette use and smoking was deemed likely to be causal according to the Bradford-Hill criteria.â
Additionally the review found âlimited evidenceâ that freebase nicotine e-cigarettes used with clinical support âare as efficacious as smoking cessation aids as approved nicotine replacement therapy or usual care/no interventionâ.
âThe published evidence indicates that use of nicotine e-cigarettes increases the risks of adverse health outcomes, including addiction, poisoning, toxicity from inhalation (including seizures), and lung injury (largely but not exclusively attributable to THC/vitamin E acetate-containing products),â Banks et al wrote.
âThere is evidence for adverse effects on cardiovascular health measures (including blood pressure and heart rate) and lung function. We identified a range of health harms, and no benefits, for non-smokers who use e-cigarettes.
âFor non-nicotine e-cigarettes, we found no benefits in terms of smoking cessation, harms related to devices, and uncertainty regarding health effects, indicating overall harm.â
Professor Banks called on medical professionals to âdo a little thought experimentâ.
âWhat would it look like if e-cigarettes were truly targeted to smokers who wanted to quit?â she asked.
â[Tobacco companies] would have applied to have them licensed. They have not been licensed by any medical authority worldwide.
âThese companies are saying this is really great for quitting smoking, but they’ve never had it tested, they’ve never put it to the FDA, theyâve never tried to get it licensed.
âThe Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency in England has even said, âwe want companies to submit to usâ. They are actively calling for submissions and nobody’s submitted to them.â
She said licensing e-cigarettes for smokers who want to quit was not going to let tobacco companies âhook the next generation of customersâ.
âIt seems to me that the pro-vaping lobby thinks that they can dismiss evidence because they disagree with it,â Professor Banks said.
âBut we have to actually look at what the data are really saying. We need a comprehensive approach. It certainly doesn’t work to make things freely available, and then tell young people not to do it. That’s one thing we definitely know doesn’t work.
âWe need to be working on supply and demand. The market has been flooded by e-cigarette products, and they’re freely available. The first thing is we need to shut down that flood.
âThere’s been this huge, concerted campaign by cigarette companies to flood the market to undermine the legislation. And then they say, look, it doesn’t work.
âWe’ve got to enforce this.â
On ABC Melbourne this morning, Mr Butler reemphasised his plans to crack down on both the importation and sale of vaping products.
âWe’re going to do that in co-operation with the states,â he said. âWe talk about this as state and federal Health Ministers, and across-the-board Liberal and Labor alike, state Health Ministers are determined to work with us to crack down on this issue.â
Another Australian systematic released this week in the Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery found that vapes are at risk for âspontaneous combustion that can cause serious oral and maxillofacial injuries, particularly to the lower facial third and commonly requiring surgical managementâ.
âSafety of these devices should be improved through increased user education and regulation,â the authors wrote.