27 August 2020

Too much faith put in imaging for low back pain

Clinical Radiology Radiology

A belief that imaging will show the source of low back pain, or protect against future litigation for clinicians, may be contributing to its ongoing overuse, according to a systematic review of 1747 patients and clinicians.

“Our review suggests that, despite guidelines recommending against the use of diagnostic imaging for non-serious low back pain for over three decades, some clinicians and their patients believe imaging is useful for locating the source of non-specific low back pain,” the Australian researchers and clinicians wrote in BMJ Open. “Although clinicians appear to be aware of the downstream consequences of unnecessary imaging, patients rarely considered the potential for harm.

As a result of the findings, they are now trialling materials for a public health campaign about the potential harms of imaging for low back pain in a bid to address the longstanding issue, the authors told The Medical Republic.

On average one in four patients presenting to primary care with low back pain, and one in three presenting to emergency care, are referred for imaging, according to a previous review and meta-analysis of more than four million Australian and international patients published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine this year.

The authors of the new study noted imaging is an important diagnostic tool where clinical features of a serious and/or specific condition are present.

“However, for patients with non-specific low back pain (about 95% of presentations in primary care), imaging does not improve outcomes and risks overdiagnosis and overtreatment,” they wrote.

Imaging is a costly exercise – Australia spent $243 million on lumbar radiographs in 2016 – but the underlying beliefs that could drive the overuse of diagnostic imaging have remained unclear, they said.

Of the participants in the 69 studies they reviewed, 54% were GPs, 4% were “medical specialists” (including rheumatologists), 19% were physiotherapists, 9% were chiropractors, 1% were occupational therapists, and 13% were unspecified.

The study revealed that many patients and clinicians in primary care believed imaging could be useful to locate the source of non-specific low back pain, however some clinicians said they had explained “time and time again” to patients that an X-ray was not a “miracle diagnostic tool”.

Lead author Ms Sweekriti Sharma told The Medical Republic that the fear of missing something sinister appeared to weigh heavily on clinicians in primary care.

“The main reason clinicians referred patients for imaging is because they fear missing some serious pathology; some clinicians mentioned they refer a patient for an X-ray even if they think there was nothing seriously wrong, just to protect themselves from litigation later on,” said Ms Sharma, a PhD candidate at the University of Sydney and the Institute for Musculoskeletal Health.

Ms Sharma added the study also revealed different perspectives on imaging that shows no definitive cause of pain.

“Some clinicians believed that absence of serious pathology on imaging is reassuring for patients.

“But for most patients, they value physical evidence and think imaging will provide that so when imaging comes back with no definitive answer, it’s frustrating and they find it hard to ‘legitimise’ their pain.”

The authors, including rheumatologist Professor Rachelle Buchbinder who chaired the steering group for The Lancet Low Back Pain Series, suggested future interventions should consider the social aspects of imaging overuse, including clinician fear of litigation and reassurance seeking among patients.

Alongside waiting room materials to address patient expectations on imaging, they said support conversations about benefits and harms of imaging might help legitimise patients’ experiences without the use of imaging.

Key points for patient discussions include: explaining the limited ability of lumbar imaging to locate the source of pain; discussing potential harms of imaging; exploring misperceptions expressed by the patient; and asking the patient to discuss their concerns.

BMJ Open 2020

COVID-19 live update
Something to say?

Leave a Reply

4 Comments on "Too much faith put in imaging for low back pain"

Please log in in to leave a comment


Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Glenn Rosendahl
Guest
Glenn Rosendahl
10 months 26 days ago
How does one diagnose ‘non-specific low back pain’? Is that a conclusion at the end of an initial consultation, or a statement one makes to a patient having concluded a formal, algorithmic diagnostic process? Would those who consider that imaging should NOT be utilized in the initial assessment of low back pain please state what alternative diagnostic algorithm they use? (I consider the ‘red flags’ quoted in the first reference to be almost laughable.) Obviously, there should be a process of ‘history taking’ and ‘physical examination’. This will be time-consuming. Will the clinician bulk-bill the consult, considering further time spend… Read more »
Dr. David Pearson
Guest
Dr. David Pearson
10 months 27 days ago

Let’s not forget the chiropractors. Every person must have a full spine xray.

Dr. I Rivlin
Guest
Dr. I Rivlin
10 months 27 days ago
it sounds like the author is not a sufferer of back pain. If he or she were, I suspect there would have been a much more conciliatory, understanding and pro-active stance on imaging. I’m 69 and work full time as a GP (and have done for 40 + years). I have suffered the misery of chronic back pain, as have many of my patients for years. It is soul destroying, undignified and depressing. A pat on the head and telling a back pain sufferer that everything will be fine, is an insulting, supercilious and grossly unprofessional desertion of G.P. standards.… Read more »
David Smith
Guest
David Smith
10 months 27 days ago
Non specific back pain? what does that mean? Back pain that has not been given a specific diagnosis. I do not think that there is any such thing. Acute back pain has a cause. Defining a localised pathology is difficult or impossible, but that does not mean that one does not exist. Nerve, muscle, joint? maybe it is better to talk of dysfunction at a particular level. Chronic back pain is more of a pain syndrome where searching for a cause can be counter productive. The medical profession has a poor track record with this, that is why there are… Read more »
wpDiscuz