15 March 2021

Telehealth extended again, but future still murky

ACRRM AMA COVID-19 RACGP Telehealth TheHill

The existing arrangements for telehealth are set to continue for a further three months while negotiations continue for the items to become permanent items on the Medicare Benefits Schedule, the prime minister says.

The decision marks the second extension of the temporary items since they were originally introduced a year ago, on 13 March 2020.

The announcement was made at the weekend by Prime Minister Scott Morrison as part of an additional $1.1 billion investment by government to extend the national COVID-19 response and suppression strategy.

As a part of the extended funding measures, telehealth services will be able to continue as temporary items on the MBS until 30 June. The additional funding has also secured the continuation of GP-led respiratory clinics.

“So far more than 51 million telehealth services have been delivered to 13 million patients and almost $2.6 billion in benefits paid,” Mr Morrison said in a media statement yesterday.

It’s been more than three months since Federal Health Minister Greg Hunt announced that telehealth would become a permanent fixture on the MBS.

The Department of Health told The Medical Republic earlier this month that it was still planning the permanent post-pandemic telehealth arrangements with peak doctor groups.

And it is still unclear whether the permanent items will be rebated at their existing rates, with some speculation that video consults could attract a higher rebate than those carried out by phone.

The AMA told The Medical Republic it would have liked to see the temporary telehealth items extended until December.

COVID-19 live update
Something to say?

Leave a Reply

3 Comments on "Telehealth extended again, but future still murky"

Please log in in to leave a comment


Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
ANDREW BAIRD
Member
ANDREW BAIRD
3 months 8 days ago

‘And it is still unclear whether the permanent items will be rebated at their existing rates, with some speculation that video consults could attract a higher rebate than those carried out by phone.’ Who is speculating that video could attract a higher rebate than phone? Department of Health? RACGP? ACRRM? AMA? Others?

ANDREW BAIRD
Member
ANDREW BAIRD
3 months 8 days ago

‘The existing arrangements for bulk-billed telehealth are set to continue…’ Just to clarify, the temporary COVID-19 MBS telehealth (video) and phone service item numbers do not have to be bulk-billed. A GP can charge a private fee, and the patient can claim the relevant benefit/rebate for the item number.

wpDiscuz