28 June 2022

Surprise! Only 2% of AHPRA complaints are anonymous


The fear of receiving an unnamed complaint far outweighs the likelihood of actually receiving one.

Opening your inbox to find AHPRA’s generic “Notification: private and confidential” email can send a doctor into “freefall”.

In the most recent RACGP Health of the Nation survey, about 63% of GPs reported dissatisfaction with the current billing and regulatory requirements and broader feedback indicated that the complaints process could be extremely stressful and onerous for doctors.

“Additionally, the stress and anxiety is often unnecessarily aggravated by unreasonably prolonged and protracted time to clear these matters,” RACGP Vice President Dr Bruce Willett told The Medical Republic.

“Health practitioners have described receiving a notification as the worst experience of their life, and say they experience significant shame, guilt and stress.”

Often, Dr Willett said, doctors reported that AHPRA’s complaint investigation progress made practitioners feel as though they were assumed to be guilty from the beginning.

AHPRA tends to avoid sharing the name of the notifier with the health practitioner who has been complained about, but does often share the name of the patient (if one is involved).

There is also, however, the option to make a complaint completely anonymously, where the details of the person making the complaint are not necessarily clear to AHPRA itself and their name is not recorded.

According to psychiatrist Dr Helen Schultz, who has a special interest in clinician mental health, receiving an AHPRA complaint is bad – but receiving an anonymous AHPRA complaint is worse.

“If there’s no name to it, that just sends you into freefall,” she told TMR.

“Because at least if there’s a name, you can start peeling back and looking at the context – go to that patient’s file, try and remember what happened or start to clarify the facts from the just the anxiety and speculation in your mind.”

Dr Schultz has recently started a consultancy venture which aims to help ease the administrative and emotional burden on doctors who have had a complaint made against them.

Having been on the receiving end of both anonymous and non-anonymous AHPRA complaints, Dr Schultz said the anonymous complaint had made her suspicious of her own colleagues.

“If you have a grievance with a colleague, you just don’t like them, you just want to make life difficult for them – there is absolutely nothing in the way of you jumping online and making a complaint anonymously,” she said.

In a system which many already feel has very little recourse, it is no surprise that the prospect of receiving an anonymous complaint – where the person on the receiving end has even less agency – is particularly galling.

Which is why it may be surprising to hear that only 2% of the complaints AHPRA received in the 2020-21 year were anonymous.

In that year, there were 5516 notifications lodged with AHPRA. A total of 7329 medical practitioners were on the receiving end of a notification when Office of the Health Ombudsman (Qld) and Health Professional Councils Authority (NSW) data is included.

All told, that represents about 6% of doctors Australia-wide.

“We continue to accept confidential and anonymous notifications, which are now more common than they have been previously,” a spokesman for AHPRA and the national boards told TMR.

“We take extra care with anonymous complaints to ensure that there are sufficient details in the information to make a notification before we progress it.”

In December 2020, AHPRA published a framework for identifying and assessing vexatious complaints, which it said will help “address concerns that anonymous complaints would enable vexatious complaints to increase”.? 

The framework will be reviewed by the National Health Practitioner Ombudsman later this year.? 

At the time it was released, vexatious complaints were estimated to make up just 1% of complaints.

Something to say?

Leave a Reply

3 Comments on "Surprise! Only 2% of AHPRA complaints are anonymous"

Please log in in to leave a comment

Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Dr Arthur Raiskio
Dr Arthur Raiskio
1 month 12 days ago

A problem I have experienced is vexatious complaints from drug seeking patients whom I would not prescribe to because of inadequate information. I now have a rule that I need formal details of why, what, how much, when started and what oversight. Regular specialist review oversight if appropriate along with need for an annual independent review. Some have brought documentation with them that have been dubious and took offense when I advised I needed confirmation from former practices. Have done nothing but good practice and still got complaints lodged.

Michael Gliksman
1 month 15 days ago
There is no question in my mind (and extrapolating from the experience of others) that AHPRA, like the HCCC in NSW, knowingly weaponises anonymous unmeritorious complaints from colleagues and others. In failing to impose consequences on those who make such complaints, AHPRA knowingly (IMO) encourages them. Why? That would be for AHPRA & the HCCC to explain, not that they appear to feel the need to do so, But I am reminded of the NSW Police ex-Commissioner Mick Fuller’s justification for his officers’ penchant for strip-searching children in public ie: to “instil a bit of fear”. Some might refer to… Read more »
Joe Kosterich
1 month 16 days ago

Surprise! Vexatious complaints don’t have to be anonymous.