In some countries, parents are fined if they don't vaccinate their child or they have to go on a course before being granted an exemption
Countries around the world, including Australia, are using different ways to get parents to vaccinate their children.
Our new research, published this week in the journal Milbank Quarterly, looks at diverse mandatory vaccination policies across the world. We explore whether different countries mandate many vaccines, or just a few; if there are sanctions for not vaccinating, such as fines; and how easy it is for parents to get out of vaccinating.
This is part of ongoing research to see what Australia could learn from other countriesâ attempts to increase childhood vaccination rates.
Read more: A short history of vaccine objection, vaccine cults and conspiracy theories
The shift from voluntary vaccination
Until recently, many governments preferred vaccination to be voluntary. They relied on persuasion and encouragement to try to overcome parentsâ hesitancy or refusal to vaccinate their children.
However, recent measles outbreaks have made those methods less politically tenable. The rise of pro-vaccination activism and the polarisation of public debate about immunisation policy has motivated governments to take a more hard-line approach.
Read more: Measles outbreaks show legal challenges of balancing personal rights and public good
Early evidence from Italy, France, California and Australia indicates this has led to higher vaccination rates. But different countries have pursued very different policies.
Australiaâs federal âNo Jab, No Payâ policy removes entitlements and childcare subsidies from unvaccinated families. Four Australian states also have âNo Jab, No Playâ policies to limit vaccine refusersâ access to childcare.
Read more: Banning unvaccinated kids from child care may have unforeseen consequences
California bans unvaccinated children from school, and Italy fines their parents. France classifies vaccine refusal as âchild endangermentâ and can impose hefty fines.
Some governments can use more than one method at once, like Australiaâs mix of state and federal policies. Italyâs new policy uses a combination of excluding unvaccinated children from daycare and fines for parents.
Making it hard to refuse
Australia, Italy, France and California make it difficult for parents to refuse vaccines by only permitting medical exemptions to their mandatory policies.
However, other jurisdictions ultimately allow parents to refuse vaccines, albeit using different methods. For example, Germany and the state of Washington require parents to be counselled by medical professionals before they obtain an exemption to vaccinating their child. In Michigan, public health staff provide a mandatory education course for parents seeking non-medical exemptions.
Which policy leads parents to vaccinate?
We can assess a policy to get parents to vaccinate using a notion called âsalienceâ. Put simply, will a vaccination policy actually make parents vaccinate?
For example, Australiaâs federal vaccine mandate has become more salient since parents can no longer obtain conscientious objections and risk losing benefits for not vaccinating.
But there are other factors to consider, such as whether a policy promotes timely vaccination.
Australiaâs âNo Jab, No Payâ policy applies to children from birth, so it motivates parents to vaccinate on time. But the United States has state-level policies that prompt parents to have their children up-to-date with their vaccinations when they start daycare or primary school.
Who doesnât have to vaccinate?
Another important question is who gets to duck away from the hand of government. Australiaâs âNo Jab, No Payâ policy leaves wealthy vaccine refusers untouched as they are ineligible for the means-tested benefits docked from unvaccinated families.
And Australian statesâ policies to exclude vaccine refusersâ children from daycare doesnât affect families who donât use daycare.
Since France and California exclude unvaccinated children from school, these countries have the capacity to reach parents more equitably (almost everyone wants to send their kids to school so more people are incentivised to vaccinate). In both places, you can homeschool if you really donât want to vaccinate.
Addressing the many reasons for not vaccinating
Mandatory vaccination policies also need to recognise the two types of parent whose child might be unvaccinated. Much airtime focuses on vaccine refusers. However, at least half the children who are not up-to-date with their vaccines face barriers to accessing vaccination, such as social disadvantage or logistical problems getting to a clinic. They are the children of underprivileged parents, not vaccine refusers.
When it comes to the vaccination status of disadvantaged children entering daycare, Australian states have chosen a âlight touchâ as part of the âNo Jab, No Playâ policy. Existing state policies provide grace periods or exemptions for these families.
But the federal âNo Jab, No Payâ hits all parents where it hurts, and offers no exemptions or grace periods to disadvantaged families. Likewise, Californiaâs school entry mandate makes no such exceptions. Italy and France have daycare exclusions similar to âNo Jab, No Playâ in their policies, but we have not found any evidence they make exceptions for disadvantaged families.
Read more: Forget ‘no jab, no pay’ schemes, there are better ways to boost vaccination
Finally, mandatory vaccination policies vary on how much they cost for governments to deliver. Oversight of parents, such as inspections or implementing fines, can drain government resources. And educational programs for parents seeking exemptions are expensive to run.
Governments can outsource some of these costs to parents (for instance, parents may have to pay a fee to see a doctor for an exemption).
Governments can also hand over the tasks to medical professionals, but then they have less control over what these professionals do. For instance, California is now seeking tighter regulation of doctors who say children are eligible for medical exemptions. This monitoring will cost the state, but will allow greater oversight. Victoria also had problems with doctors who accommodated vaccine refusers.
So where does this leave us?
Our work investigating international strategies to get parents to vaccinate their children is ongoing. Australians seem strongly attached to our vaccine mandates. But both state and federal policies have undergone tweaks since their inception.
Any future adjustments should ensure all parents are targeted, that disadvantaged families are not further disadvantaged, and that we make it very easy for everybody to access vaccines in their communities and on time.
Globally, as more jurisdictions move away from voluntary child vaccination to mandatory policies, we need to get a clearer picture of how these policies work for families, government and the policy enforcers, including school staff and health professionals.
Authors
is Senior Lecturer, University of Western Australia
is Professor, Department of Philosophy, Oakland University
Disclosure
Katie Attwell receives funding from the Australian Research Council as a Discovery Early Career Researcher Award Fellow (Project Number DE190100158). She has received past research funding from Sanofi Pasteur. She has previously received travel, accommodation and conference registration support from GSK, and speaker’s fees from Merck.
Mark Navin does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons licence. Read the original article.
